Reasonable accommodation is defined by function, not by a list. An accommodation is reasonable if it enables a qualified individual with a disability to perform the essential functions of their job, or to enjoy equal terms and privileges of employment, without imposing undue hardship.
Examples are still useful, because employers frequently cannot picture what an accommodation looks like. These are grouped by the barrier they address.
Where no accommodation enables the employee to perform their current job, reassignment to a vacant position for which they are qualified may be a reasonable accommodation. The employer is generally not required to create a position, displace another employee, or promote the individual.
The test is effectiveness, not preference. An employer is not required to provide the specific accommodation requested if an alternative is equally effective — but the alternative must actually work, and the reasoning should be documented. An accommodation that is cheaper and does not remove the barrier is not an accommodation.
Treating cost as the determining factor. Most accommodations cost little or nothing, and undue hardship is assessed against the employer's overall resources rather than a departmental budget. Employers who reject accommodations on cost without analysis rarely have a defensible position.
Employers frequently assume accommodation is expensive, and the assumption drives more refusals than any genuine hardship analysis. In reality a large proportion of accommodations cost nothing at all — a schedule change, a relocated workstation, permission to sit, a modified break pattern.
Where equipment is needed, the cost is usually modest relative to recruiting and training a replacement. And undue hardship is assessed against the employer's overall resources, not a departmental budget line, which is a distinction managers routinely miss.
Accommodations are not necessarily permanent. Some address a temporary limitation and end when it resolves; others continue indefinitely; many are adjusted over time as circumstances change.
What matters is that changes are made through the interactive process rather than unilaterally. Withdrawing an effective accommodation without discussion, or allowing one to lapse quietly during a reorganisation, is a common route to a complaint.
No, provided the alternative is genuinely effective.
Generally not, but leave of a defined and reasonable duration frequently is — including after FMLA is exhausted.
Accommodation should be reviewed as circumstances change, but withdrawing an effective accommodation without a basis invites a claim.
See job restructuring under the ADA and documenting the accommodation process. For training, see the integrated FMLA, ADA, COBRA and workers' compensation program.
Recommended Online Training Courses
Recommended In-Person Seminars